Login to Portal

Forgot your password? Click here.

Don’t have an account? Click here.

IUOE

CT Construction Digest Monday december 23, 2019

Norwich seeks state approval for $167 million sewer system upgrade
Claire Bessette
Norwich — After years of negotiations with the state, revised plans, rising costs, Norwich Public Utilities hopes it has developed a plan to upgrade the city’s nearly 100-year-old sewage treatment system that continues to pollute Norwich Harbor and the Thames River when heavy rains overwhelm the system.
NPU will propose a $167 million compromise plan to the state Department of Energy and Environmental Protection in January in response to the agency’s rejection of NPU’s previous $150 million proposed upgrade plan and to counter DEEP’s request for a much larger $270 million pollution control plan.
NPU officials presented the new proposal to the Board of Public Utilities Commissioners on Thursday and will meet with DEEP officials in January in an effort to win state approval to move forward finally with the upgrade project. The state issued an order to the city in 2016 to correct the frequent sewage and stormwater overflows into the Thames River, which happen even with storms with as low as a quarter- to a half-inch of rain.
NPU General Manager Chris LaRose said the city utility will stress to the state that Norwich could not afford the state's proposed $270 million upgrade, which would call for installing controls on sewage overflows that would capture untreated runoff from all storms up to the worst average expected event in a typical two-year period.
NPU’s compromise plan would require average sewer rate increases of 5 percent per year for the first five years starting in 2021 for the project to be funded with a combination of state grants and low-interest loans through the Clean Water Fund. Construction would be done over a five-year period, and afterward, NPU is seeking state approval for a “capital recovery break” to ease the costs to ratepayers before continuing with longer-term system upgrades, LaRose said.
The proposed compromise plan has three main components: an $80 million major upgrade to the sewage treatment plant on Hollyhock Island on Falls Avenue, a $53 million new wet weather combined sewage overflow treatment plant to be built on Falls Avenue and a new Rose Alley pumping station underground at the city-owned viaduct parking lot.
Larry Sullivan, NPU wastewater integrity manager, said the new wet weather treatment plant would come on during storms when combined sewage and stormwater flows typically would overwhelm the existing treatment plant. The flow would be diverted into the new treatment facility, where solids and debris would be screened out and liquids treated with chlorine before the water is released into Norwich Harbor. When the storm ends and flows drop, the diverted system would shut down gradually.
Sullivan said in designing the new proposal, Norwich has learned from the experiences of the four other Connecticut cities already working to upgrade aging and polluting systems. New Haven learned that just cutting off stormwater collection from the sewer system meant the water ended up in private lawns and basements of homes and businesses. The better plan would be to divert the overflow into a wet weather treatment system.
Currently, the Rose Alley pumping station behind Main Street, the system’s largest, can handle 11 million gallons per day. The proposed new pumping station would handle 60 million gallons per day with a screening system to collect all manner of debris that ends up in the sewage system — 2-liter plastic bottles, a full-size mop and handle and a bath towel, to name a few recent items, Sullivan said.
NPU officials estimated the proposed upgrades would reduce the number of overflow events by 93 percent and the overflow volume by 80 percent.
If DEEP approves the compromise plan, NPU officials estimated final design work would be done in 2020 and 2021, and construction could start in 2021.
No interruptions in the daily operations are anticipated, Sullivan said, which is why it would take some five years to build. He likened the timeframe to state repairs and upgrades to a major highway. If you could close Interstate 95, for example, you could repair and repave it within days. But by keeping it open, the work could take years.

Opinion: Fight over tolls not going away
Patrick Sasser
Does our new governor and our elected state officials truly believe this past year has just been about fighting against tolls, or has this been a cry for help?
There is no doubt the year 2019 has been the year of the tolls (no tolls) battle royale, but as I sit and reflect on this past year, it’s clear to me this is much bigger than just tolls.
As our grassroots movement began to grow legs during the early spring of 2019, shortly after Gov. Ned Lamont took office, it was clear to me the people of our small state have had all they can take from the enormous tax machine under the gold dome in Hartford.
You could hear it in people’s voices when we would gather at one of the 40 roadside rallies we held across the state. People just could not stand to have another penny taken from them. As the movement grew and more than 100,000 people signed the petition, it was clear the taxpayers in Connecticut had reached their breaking point.
When 2,500 people gathered on a beautiful Saturday on the front steps of the Capitol they cried out “No Tolls!” but the true message was that Connecticut must stop the overtaxation. We are hurting the middle class and those who are struggling to live here. This was the real message coming loud and clear from the people of Connecticut.
The question I have is, why haven’t the governor or the Democratic leadership picked up on this? No matter how many toll plans they come up with, trucks and cars or trucks only, the cries from the people will always remain the same.
What’s worse for everyone — the governor included — is that the trust between the government and the governed is broken.
So I am encouraging the governor to dig deep into all departments in the state starting with the Connecticut Department of Transportation. Conducting these audits by a third-party vendor would show that the governor is willing to stand shoulder to shoulder with us the taxpayers. Let’s find out if every penny the state is collecting is being used efficiently and wisely. Almost every person who enters into the role of CEO of a business or corporation starts with finding ways to make the business more cost-effective and looks to make sure the company is not bleeding money.
It is important to have a modern, reliable and safe transportation system. The economic future of the state depends upon it. However, more taxes in the form of tolls is not the way to get there.
Ned Lamont came from the business world; he should understand this is a valid request from the people. Just look at what happened when the Port Authority was audited. Please, governor, for the sake of bringing back trust, order this audit before coming to the taxpayer for a single penny more. Tolls are now dead in the year 2019, yet the fight will continue in 2020 (an election year). Although it will be a new year, the feelings of the taxpayers will not change.
This is not just about stopping tolls; it’s much bigger now.
The governor has failed to mention the people. He’s talked about big business, labor unions and fellow lawmakers who all stand shoulder to shoulder with him, but the people have been left out of the conversation. What about us? What about “we the people”? Do we not matter, do we not have a say?
No Tolls CT gave every Democrat, Republican, independent or anyone of any party affiliation the platform to speak out and to be heard.
We don’t need to sit in a corner and let others dictate the path our state will follow. It is the people who choose the path of government, not the other way around. We have a voice, and we’re not going anywhere.
Patrick Sasser, of Stamford, is the founder of No Tolls CT.